毕竟，一时的热点会降温，但一个能持续长出「龙虾」的生态，才是真正的护城河。
3��9���Ƀ��C�^�[�����J�����L�����]�ځB���`�̃W�����[�E�W���[�A�t�����N�t���g�̃N���X�g�t�E�V���^�C�c�A�j���[���[�N�̃h�C���\���E�I���f�B�|�ɂ������ށB�\�E���̃����E�q�M�����A�W���E�q�����W���A�V���K�|�[���̃R�N�E�V���t�C���lj����ށB�A���E�}���[�E���[���g���[�A�A�_���E�W���[�_�������M�B�W�F�C�~�[�E�t���[�h�A�G�h�E�B�i�E�M�u�X�A�X�[�U���E�t�F���g���A�I�[�����E�G���X���ҏW�B
。viber对此有专业解读
On its face, there is something strange about this way of understanding the tort of negligence — at least on the assumption that a tort such as negligence is a sort of legal wrong that tracks a sort of moral wrong. The negligence tort, so understood, does not appear to track any recognizable sort of moral wrong at all; it is rare to see anyone other than defenders of the Palsgraf perspective refer to such a thing as a qualified duty (or wrong) of non-injury. By itself this observation is hardly damning. Philosophical reflection can sometimes reveal that our ordinary moral practices are implicitly committed to the existence of some complex moral phenomenon that no concept in our ordinary moral vocabulary readily picks out. Nevertheless, the prima facie oddity of the idea of a qualified moral duty (or wrong) of non-injury invites the question of whether a more plausible moral understanding of what a tort is — and what tort law is doing — might be found.84
// cuisine: { Italian: 142, French: 38, Japanese: 27 },